SARS-CoV-2 testing and COVID-19-related primary care use among people with citizenship, permanent residency, and temporary immigration status: an analysis of population-based administrative data in British Columbia.

OBJECTIVES: Having temporary immigration status affords limited rights, workplace protections, and access to services. There is not yet research data on impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic for people with temporary immigration status in Canada. METHODS: We use linked administrative data to describe SARS-CoV-2 testing, positive tests, and COVID-19 primary care service use in British Columbia from January 1, 2020 to July 31, 2021, stratified by immigration status (citizen, permanent resident, temporary resident). We plot the rates of people tested and confirmed positive for COVID-19 by week from April 19, 2020 to July 31, 2021 across immigration groups. We use logistic regression to estimate adjusted odds ratios of a positive SARS-CoV-2 test, access to testing, and primary care among people with temporary status or permanent residency, compared with people who hold citizenship. RESULTS: A total of 4,146,593 people with citizenship, 914,089 people with permanent residency, and 212,215 people with temporary status were included. Among people with temporary status, 52.1% had "male" administrative sex and 74.4% were ages 20-39, compared with 50.1% and 24.4% respectively among those with citizenship. Of people with temporary status, 4.9% tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 over this period, compared with 4.0% among people with permanent residency and 2.1% among people with citizenship. Adjusted odds of a positive SARS-CoV-2 test among people with temporary status were almost 50% higher (aOR 1.42, 95% CI 1.39, 1.45), despite having half the odds of access to testing (aOR 0.53, 95% CI 0.53, 0.54) and primary care (aOR 0.50, 95% CI 0.49, 0.52). CONCLUSION: Interwoven immigration, health, and occupational policies place people with temporary status in circumstances of precarity and higher health risk. Reducing precarity accompanying temporary status, including regularization pathways, and decoupling access to health care from immigration status can address health inequities.

RéSUMé: OBJECTIFS: Le statut d'immigration temporaire confère des droits, des mesures de protection au travail et un accès aux services limités. Il n'y a pas encore de données de recherche sur les impacts de la pandémie de COVID-19 chez les personnes ayant un statut d'immigration temporaire au Canada. MéTHODE: Nous utilisons des données administratives maillées pour décrire le dépistage du SRAS-CoV-2, les tests positifs et l'utilisation des services de soins de première ligne liés à la COVID-19 en Colombie-Britannique entre le 1er janvier 2020 et le 31 juillet 2021, stratifiées selon le statut d'immigration (citoyenneté, résidence permanente, résidence temporaire). Nous reportons sur des graphiques les taux hebdomadaires de personnes testées et confirmées positives pour la COVID-19 entre le 19 avril 2020 et le 31 juillet 2021 dans les groupes d'immigration. Nous utilisons la régression logistique pour estimer les rapports de cotes ajustés d'un test positif pour le SRAS-CoV-2, de l'accès au dépistage et de l'accès aux soins primaires chez les personnes ayant le statut de résidents temporaires ou permanents comparativement aux personnes ayant la citoyenneté canadienne. RéSULTATS: En tout, 4 146 593 citoyens, 914 089 résidents permanents et 212 215 résidents temporaires ont été inclus. Chez les personnes ayant le statut de résidents temporaires, 52,1 % étaient de sexe administratif « masculin ¼ et 74,4 % avaient entre 20 et 39 ans, contre 50,1 % et 24,4 % respectivement chez les personnes ayant la citoyenneté. Chez les résidents temporaires, 4,9 % avaient obtenu un test positif pour le SRAS-CoV-2 au cours de la période de l'étude, contre 4 % chez les résidents permanents et 2,1 % chez les citoyens. La probabilité ajustée d'un test positif pour le SRAS-CoV-2 chez les personnes ayant le statut de résidents temporaires était près de 50 % plus élevée (RCa 1,42, IC de 95 % 1,39, 1,45), même si leurs probabilités d'accès au dépistage (RCa 0,53, IC de 95 % 0,53, 0,54) et aux soins primaires (RCa 0,50, IC de 95 % 0,49, 0,52) étaient moitié moindres. CONCLUSION: La conjugaison des politiques d'immigration, de santé et de main-d'œuvre met les personnes ayant le statut de résidents temporaires en situation de précarité et de risques accrus pour la santé. La réduction de la précarité qui accompagne le statut temporaire, dont les voies de régularisation, et le découplage entre l'accès aux soins de santé et le statut d'immigration pourraient répondre aux iniquités en santé.

Qualitative evaluation of a mandatory health insurance 'wait period' in a publicly funded health system: understanding health inequities for newcomer im/migrant women.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate impacts of a residency-based waiting period for health insurance coverage on lived experiences of health and settlement for im/migrant women in British Columbia, Canada. DESIGN: The IRIS study is a mixed-methods, community-based, qualitative evaluation of recently arrived im/migrant women's access to sexual and reproductive care. In-depth, semistructured interviews were conducted by trained multilingual and multicultural interviewers with lived migration experience in the participant's preferred language. SETTING: Metro Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada from July 2018 to January 2020. PARTICIPANTS: Data collected from community focus groups (four groups, n=29) of both service providers and im/migrant women was used. Following this, qualitative interviews with service providers (n=10) and im/migrant women (n=47) were conducted. Eligible participants self-identified as women; were aged 18-49 and had arrived in Canada from another country. Eligible providers were employed in the health, social or legal sectors working with im/migrant women. RESULTS: The wait period resulted in mistrust and internalised stigma for racialised im/migrant women, for whom the policy resulted in feeling 'undeserving' of care. Resulting administrative burden produced delays and unmet need for care, particularly related to sexual and reproductive healthcare and children's health. Unexpected costs meant difficult choices between survival and care. Negative health outcomes included the inability to family plan, difficulties during pregnancy, as well as hardships related not being able to seek help for sick children. Community-based organisations provided support in many areas but could not fill all gaps produced by this policy. CONCLUSIONS: Findings highlight severe, yet commonly overlooked, health inequities produced by a mandatory health coverage wait period within a purportedly 'universal' healthcare system. Health system policies such as mandatory 'waiting periods' produce discriminatory and inequitable outcomes for im/migrant women. Policy reforms towards full 'healthcare for all' are urgently needed to affirm the health and human rights of all im/migrants.